The Higher Liberty
Order the book The Higher Liberty
The Higher Liberty
by Gregory HHC, d
Minister of His Holy Church
Go to the Table of Contents
Deception
Caesar
was right, mankind is governed by names and their definitions.
This was the definition of democracy in 1928:
“DEMOCRACY: A government of the
masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any form of direct
expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is
communistic - negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that
the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon
deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without
restraint or regard for consequences. Results in demagogism, license,
agitation, discontent, anarchy.”
By
June 1952, the following definition was altering the understanding
and attitude of the American nation:
“Meaning of democracy: Because
the United States is a democracy, the majority of the people decide
how our government will be organized and run - and that includes the
Army, Navy and Air Force. The people do this by electing
representatives, and these men and women carry out the wishes of the
people.”
Changing
definitions deceives the people. “The multitude of those who
err is no protection for error.”
“If you establish a democracy,
you must in due time reap the fruits of a democracy... with great
increase of the public expenditure. You will in due season have wars
entered into from passion and not from reason; and you will in due
season submit to peace ignominiously sought and ignominiously
obtained, which will diminish your authority and perhaps endanger
your independence. You will in due season find your property is less
valuable, and your freedom less complete.”
Ben
Franklin advised that “A nation of well informed men who have
been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them
cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny
begins.” Those rights depend upon us valuing our neighbors’
rights as much as we value our own, which is virtue.
Nothing
is beyond re-examination. In a constitutional republic, you might
have some safeguards but Patrick Henry argued against the
Constitution of the United States because he saw that “When
evil men take office, the whole gang will be in collusion! They will
keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by
ambuscade!” Do we understand those flaws, and are we prepared
to guard against them? It was not the Constitution that made this nation great, but the noble individuals who rose up
every day, worked in the fields and factories, cared for their
families, and provided for the honest needs of their community.
James
Russell Lowell said “Democracy gives every man the right to be
his own oppressor” and he begins the process by
oppressing his neighbor. “Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have
removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the
people that these liberties are of the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath?”
Democracy
has no inherent right to the rights of others. We relinquish right by
consent for mutual benefits. “I often wonder whether we do not
rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and courts.
These are false hopes, believe me; these are false hopes. Liberty
lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no court can save it.”
----------
Return to the Table of Contents, Alphabetical Index or purchase the book The Higher Liberty
Related Articles and Audio:
Romans 13 part 1
http://www.hisholychurch.org/media/audio/rm/Romans131.ram
ROMANS 13 verse 1 the higher liberty
Does God want us to be subject or to be free?
http://www.hisholychurch.org/sermon/romans13.php
Romans 13 and I Peter 2,13-14
Is the Bible consistent about setting men free or does it contradict itself?
http://www.hisholychurch.org/sermon/romanspeter.php
Romans 13, NN Video Series:7-10 4:32
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SEMYx6affo
Footnotes:
|